Current:Home > InvestPublishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices -EliteFunds
Publishers Clearing House to pay $18.5 million settlement for deceptive sweepstakes practices
View
Date:2025-04-14 19:28:03
Publishers Clearing House agreed to pay out $18.5 million for "deceptive and unfair" sweepstakes practices and change several of its business tactics, the Federal Trade Commission said in a news release on Tuesday.
A proposed court order filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York stipulates that the publishing company needs to make substantial changes to how it conducts its sweepstake drawings and entries online. Mostly older and lower-income consumers are lured to the Publishers Clearing House sweepstakes by catchy language on the company's website such as: "WIN IT!," or "Win for Life!," an FTC complaint said.
Some are lucky: one Pennsylvania-based woman won a $1 million dollar sweepstake prize. Others hope to win money in the sweepstakes and keep purchasing products or paying fees to increase their limited chances, court documents said.
After hopeful customers click on sweepstakes registration links emailed to them by the company, they are directed to several web pages of advertisements for products, including magazine subscriptions, the complaint said. These pages say messages like "$1,000 per week for life AT STAKE!" and "JUST ONE ORDER IS ALL IT TAKES," the news release said.
Consumers interested in entering sweepstakes contests are led to believe "they must order products before they can enter a sweepstake" or that "ordering products increases their odds of winning a sweepstake," the complaint said. One California based-woman thought she won a $5,000 prize, but the company blamed a "technical malfunction" and said that under "official rules" she didn't win and they weren't responsible.
"Today's action builds on previous efforts to crack down on companies that use illegal dark patterns to fuel digital deception and harm consumers," FTC Chair Lina Khan and commissioners said in a statement.
Once consumers enter their email addresses they continue to receive alerts from the company saying that they must take another step to be eligible for sweepstakes prizes, the complaint said. In addition to these misleading practices, Publishers Clearing House hid shipping and handling costs from consumers until there was a financial obligation. While the company also maintained they didn't sell or rent consumer data, the FTC alleges they did as such until around January 2019, when Publishers Clearing House learned they were being investigated, according to court documents.
"While we disagree with the FTC's assertions and have admitted no wrongdoing, we agreed to settle this matter in order to avoid the ongoing expense and distraction of litigation," Christopher Irving, the company's Vice President for Consumer and Legal Affairs, said in a statement.
"The integrity of our sweepstakes prizes and awards was never questioned. We worked hard to address any issues the FTC raised," Publishers Clearing House said.
The $18.5 million dollar fund will be used to refund consumers and implement promised changes to Publishers Clearing House's business practices. These changes include making clear disclosures on their sweepstake entry web pages, stopping surprise fees and shipping charges and stopping deceptive emails, court documents said.
- In:
- Federal Trade Commission
Cara Tabachnick is a news editor for CBSNews.com. Contact her at cara.tabachnick@cbsinteractive.com
veryGood! (35)
Related
- Meta donates $1 million to Trump’s inauguration fund
- For stomach pain and other IBS symptoms, new apps can bring relief
- Unfounded fears about rainbow fentanyl become the latest Halloween boogeyman
- Leaking Well Temporarily Plugged as New Questions Arise About SoCal Gas’ Actions
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- How Teddi Mellencamp's Cancer Journey Pushed Her to Be Vulnerable With Her Kids
- How Harris is listening — and speaking — about abortion rights before the midterms
- Today’s Climate: July 13, 2010
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Researchers Find No Shortcuts for Spotting Wells That Leak the Most Methane
Ranking
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Today’s Climate: July 30, 2010
- Givenchy’s Cult Favorite Black Magic Lipstick Is Finally Back in Stock and It’s on Sale
- What Is Nitrous Oxide and Why Is It a Climate Threat?
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- East Coast Shatters Temperature Records, Offering Preview to a Warming World
- How did the Canadian wildfires start? A look at what caused the fires that are sending smoke across the U.S.
- IRS sends bills to taxpayers with the wrong due date for some
Recommendation
Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
Supreme Court sides with Jack Daniels in trademark fight over poop-themed dog toy
How did the Canadian wildfires start? A look at what caused the fires that are sending smoke across the U.S.
The 5-minute daily playtime ritual that can get your kids to listen better
Sarah J. Maas books explained: How to read 'ACOTAR,' 'Throne of Glass' in order.
Trump EPA Tries Again to Roll Back Methane Rules for Oil and Gas Industry
Jury convicts Oregon man who injured FBI bomb technician with shotgun booby trap
Metalloproteins? Breakthrough Could Speed Algae-Based Fuel Research