Current:Home > NewsCharles Langston:Ex-military couple hit with longer prison time in 4th sentencing in child abuse case -EliteFunds
Charles Langston:Ex-military couple hit with longer prison time in 4th sentencing in child abuse case
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-09 08:10:45
NEWARK,Charles Langston N.J. (AP) — A former U.S. Army major and his wife accused of routinely beating their young foster children and denying them food and water as punishment have been sentenced for a fourth time.
Carolyn Jackson was ordered Monday to serve nearly 12 years in prison, while her husband, John, was sentenced to 9 years. The terms were imposed by U.S. District Judge Susan Wigenton, who was assigned to the case in April after a federal appeals court found U.S. District Judge Katharine Hayden — who had handled the previous three sentencings — failed to follow its directions to consider the children’s multiple injuries “holistically and in the context of the jury’s findings of guilt” in determining causation.
Federal prosecutors had appealed each of the sentences imposed by Hayden, arguing they were too lenient. Noting the repeated sentencings, the appellate panel also concluded that Hayden — who presided over the Jacksons’ 2015 trial — would have “substantial difficulty in putting out of her mind her previously expressed views of the evidence,” so they ordered that the matter be reassigned to another jurist.
The last sentencing in the case occurred in October 2021. Carolyn Jackson, who had already served a 40-month prison term in two stretches, was sentenced to time served and given an additional year of supervised release. John Jackson, who had finished a probationary term, was sentenced to 18 months’ home confinement.
At the time, Hayden concluded that imposing more prison time “is more punishment than is necessary.” Prosecutors, who had recommended a sentencing range of between nine and 11 years, called the sentences insufficient and accused Hayden of not following guidelines set by the appeals court.
In 2015, the U.S. attorney’s office had sought prison sentences of 15 years or more after the couple was convicted on multiple counts of child endangerment. After the first sentencing was struck down, Hayden extended their sentences in 2018, but that was rejected on appeal as well.
Sentencing in the case has been complicated by the fact that the trial took place in federal court since the Jacksons lived at Picatinny Arsenal, a New Jersey military facility, during the time in question. Because child endangerment is not a federal crime, state endangerment charges were merged into the federal indictment to go along with a conspiracy count and two federal assault counts.
The Jacksons were acquitted of the assault counts, but prosecutors argued Hayden should sentence them under assault guidelines anyway because the nature of the child endangerment counts made them “sufficiently analogous” to assault. Defense attorneys argued prosecutors didn’t connect specific acts by the Jacksons to injuries the children suffered.
The Jacksons’ trial produced testimony that their three foster children suffered broken bones, were severely underweight and had other health problems when they were removed from the home in 2010. The couple’s biological son testified the couple forced the children to eat hot pepper flakes and drink hot sauce as punishment.
A fourth foster child in their care died, but the Jacksons weren’t charged with his death. At trial, the Jacksons’ lawyers argued that the children had preexisting health problems, and said the couple’s child-rearing methods may have been unconventional but weren’t criminal.
veryGood! (856)
Related
- How to watch the 'Blue Bloods' Season 14 finale: Final episode premiere date, cast
- Six Takeaways About Tropical Cyclones and Hurricanes From The New IPCC Report
- A Decade Into the Fracking Boom, Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia Haven’t Gained Much, a Study Says
- Chris Eubanks, unlikely Wimbledon star, on surreal, whirlwind tournament experience
- Trump wants to turn the clock on daylight saving time
- Inside Clean Energy: The Coal-Country Utility that Wants to Cut Coal
- A Plunge in Mass Transit Ridership Deals a Huge Blow to Climate Change Mitigation
- Extreme heat exceeding 110 degrees expected to hit Southwestern U.S.
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Exploding California Wildfires Rekindle Debate Over Whether to Snuff Out Blazes in Wilderness Areas or Let Them Burn
Ranking
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- Missing Titanic Tourist Submersible: Identities of People Onboard Revealed
- Warming Trends: Music For Sinking Cities, Pollinators Need Room to Spawn and Equal Footing for ‘Rough Fish’
- Even after you think you bought a car, dealerships can 'yo-yo' you and take it back
- Why we love Bear Pond Books, a ski town bookstore with a French bulldog 'Staff Pup'
- The Indicator Quiz: Inflation
- From a Raft in the Grand Canyon, the West’s Shifting Water Woes Come Into View
- Is Temu legit? Customers are fearful of online scams
Recommendation
Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
Inside Clean Energy: What We Could Be Doing to Avoid Blackouts
Why the EPA puts a higher value on rich lives lost to climate change
Watch a Florida man wrestle a record-breaking 19-foot-long Burmese python: Giant is an understatement
NHL in ASL returns, delivering American Sign Language analysis for Deaf community at Winter Classic
Amid the Misery of Hurricane Ida, Coastal Restoration Offers Hope. But the Price Is High
Increased Flooding and Droughts Linked to Climate Change Have Sent Crop Insurance Payouts Skyrocketing
Inside Clean Energy: Biden’s Climate Plan Shows Net Zero is Now Mainstream